Project Finance News Today: $2.58B Saudi Power Close, $300M Renewables Facility and African Infrastructure Finance

Today’s project finance roundup covers Saudi Arabia’s $2.58B Rabigh 2 close, Lydian’s $300M facility, Egypt wind financing and African infrastructure deals.

Financely Debt Advisors

Financely Debt Advisors

— 8 min read
Share

Project Finance Markets Are Rewarding Contracted Cash Flow, Credit Support and Flexible Capital

Project finance activity entering the first full week of October is showing a broadening of the capital structures being used to move large infrastructure assets into construction.

Long-dated bank debt remains central to conventional independent power projects, but the latest transactions also include holding-company credit, equity bridge loans, partial risk guarantees, subordinated development-finance capital and local-currency credit enhancement.

October 5, 2026 snapshot: the transactions reviewed below span Saudi power generation, U.S. solar and battery storage, Egyptian wind, Sahel solar infrastructure and Nigerian infrastructure finance. The common denominator is bankability built around contracted revenues, identifiable assets, credible sponsors and deliberate allocation of construction, payment and currency risk.
1

Rabigh 2 Reaches Financial Close With $2.58 Billion of Long-Term Debt

Saudi Arabia's 2,313.5 MW Rabigh 2 combined-cycle gas turbine expansion has reached financial close after securing approximately SAR9.69 billion, or $2.58 billion, of long-term financing.

$2.58B debt 2,313.5 MW Saudi Arabia CCGT IPP

The project is being developed through Al Morjan Two Electricity Company. ACWA Power and Saudi Energy each hold a 40% interest. According to reporting on the financial close, the financing has an approximately 34-year tenor and was provided by a consortium of Saudi, regional, European and Asian banks.

The lender group includes institutions such as Riyad Bank, Saudi Awwal Bank, Saudi National Bank, HSBC Bank Middle East, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, Commercial Bank of Dubai, ICBC and Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank.

The underlying power project is supported by a long-term power purchase agreement with the Saudi Power Procurement Company. The project is also being developed as carbon-capture ready.

Financing significance: this is conventional limited-recourse IPP financing at substantial scale. Long-tenor debt becomes possible because lenders are underwriting a defined asset, a long-term offtake arrangement, experienced sponsors and a contractual framework that allocates operating, construction and revenue risk over several decades.

Read the Rabigh 2 financial close report from MEED.

2

Lydian Secures $300 Million Holdco Facility for a 6 GW Solar and Storage Pipeline

Lydian Energy, backed by Excelsior Energy Capital, has closed a $300 million holding-company credit facility with infrastructure asset manager Infranity.

$300M facility 6 GW portfolio Solar + BESS United States

The facility is designed to fund development, construction, acquisitions and operations across Lydian's expanding portfolio of utility-scale solar and battery energy storage assets.

Unlike traditional project debt advanced directly against a single special-purpose vehicle, a holdco facility can provide a developer with capital at the platform level. Lydian can therefore leverage value embedded in operating and construction-ready projects while retaining ownership of assets and continuing to advance its wider pipeline.

Lydian's portfolio includes approximately 6 GW of operating, construction-ready and development-stage projects across the United States.

Financing significance: holdco debt is becoming increasingly important for infrastructure platforms with multiple projects at different stages of maturity. The structure can bridge the gap between development capital and individual project-level financings while allowing sponsors to recycle capital more efficiently.

See the Lydian and Infranity financing announcement.

3

Scatec Uses $150 Million Equity Bridge Financing Across Major Egyptian Projects

Scatec has started construction of the 900 MW Shadwan onshore wind project in Egypt while simultaneously arranging $150 million of equity bridge loan facilities with The Arab Energy Fund.

$150M EBL 900 MW wind $716M capex Egypt

The three-year bridge facility includes $50 million allocated to Shadwan and another $100 million associated with Scatec's planned 1,950 MW solar and 3,935 MWh battery Energy Valley project.

Shadwan itself has an estimated total capital cost of approximately $716 million. Scatec has also signed a joint development agreement with EDF power solutions for a targeted 29% equity interest in the project and expects to introduce additional equity partners.

That combination matters because sponsor equity is not always funded entirely from permanent balance-sheet capital on day one. Bridge facilities can be used to optimize the timing of equity contributions while construction, project debt, development-and-construction cash flows and incoming investor capital are coordinated.

Financing significance: equity bridge loans can reduce the immediate cash requirement placed on a sponsor during construction. They are particularly useful where a developer has identifiable future equity proceeds, construction cash flows or incoming co-investors but must satisfy near-term project funding obligations.

Scatec provides the transaction details in its Shadwan project announcement.

4

Chad Solar Projects Show How Partial Risk Guarantees Can Make Weak-Offtaker Markets Financeable

The Gassi and Lamadji solar projects in Chad provide a particularly useful example of how credit enhancement can change the bankability of an emerging-market power project.

€37.9M financing 30 MWp solar 8 MWh BESS 20-year PPA

The two projects, developed by Qair, combine 30 MWp of solar capacity with 8 MWh of battery storage and will sell electricity to state utility Tchadelec under a 20-year power purchase agreement.

Financial close unlocked a €37.9 million financing package mobilized by the African Development Bank together with Proparco, the Sustainable Energy Fund for Africa and the Green Climate Fund.

More important from a structuring perspective is the €8 million partial risk guarantee jointly issued by the African Development Fund and Green Climate Fund.

The guarantee supports a letter-of-credit mechanism securing Tchadelec's payment obligations under the PPA.

Financing significance: the central credit issue in many frontier-market IPPs is not the underlying solar resource or EPC technology. It is the ability of the offtaker to make contractual payments throughout the debt tenor. A guarantee-backed LC can improve lender confidence by inserting additional credit support between the project company and a weaker utility counterparty.

The African Development Bank details the financing and guarantee structure.

5

IFC Backs InfraCredit With $50 Million to Expand Local-Currency Infrastructure Finance in Nigeria

Infrastructure financing does not always require a development institution to lend directly into every project SPV.

In Nigeria, IFC has committed a $50 million subordinated unsecured facility to InfraCredit, the country's specialized infrastructure credit-guarantee institution.

$50M subordinated debt 10-year tenor Local currency Nigeria

The 10-year facility will be disbursed in two $25 million tranches and strengthens InfraCredit's capital structure, increasing its capacity to provide guarantees supporting infrastructure issuers accessing Nigeria's domestic capital markets.

The targeted sectors include renewable energy, digital infrastructure, telecommunications, transportation, healthcare and climate-related infrastructure.

This is particularly relevant in markets where projects produce local-currency revenue but conventional international project debt is denominated in dollars or euros. Borrowing foreign currency against naira cash flow can create a material asset-liability mismatch.

Financing significance: credit guarantees can allow pension funds, insurers and other domestic institutional investors to provide long-tenor local-currency capital to infrastructure projects. The DFI capital therefore operates as a multiplier rather than simply financing one individual asset.

InfraCredit explains the structure in its IFC financing announcement.

What These Transactions Say About the Project Finance Market

These five transactions involve very different jurisdictions and infrastructure types, but the underlying credit architecture is remarkably consistent.

Long-Term Revenue Still Drives Debt Capacity PPAs and other contracted cash flows remain fundamental. Lenders want measurable revenue visibility extending sufficiently beyond construction and debt repayment periods.
Credit Enhancement Is Becoming More Important Letters of credit, partial risk guarantees and institutional guarantees can turn payment risk that commercial lenders would otherwise reject into an underwritable exposure.
Capital Is Moving Above the Project SPV Holdco facilities and platform-level financing allow experienced developers to borrow against portfolios rather than financing every development-stage expenditure exclusively at project level.
Local-Currency Finance Matters Where infrastructure revenues are denominated in domestic currency, developing local institutional debt markets can materially reduce long-term foreign-exchange risk.

The Capital Stack Is Becoming More Specialized

A credible project finance strategy increasingly involves more than identifying a bank willing to provide a senior construction loan.

Large infrastructure transactions may combine sponsor equity, development capital, senior debt, subordinated debt, equity bridge facilities, project bonds, tax equity, guarantees, political-risk cover, letters of credit and institutional capital.

The correct structure depends on where the project sits in its development cycle and which risks remain unresolved.

A pre-construction project with an unsigned offtake agreement presents a fundamentally different financing proposition from an operating asset with contracted revenues. Likewise, an IPP selling electricity to a highly rated utility does not require the same credit structure as a project selling to a financially constrained state-owned offtaker.

This is why structured project finance begins with bankability rather than simply with the amount of capital a sponsor wants to raise.

What Project Sponsors Should Take From Today's Market

The availability of capital is not the primary constraint for many infrastructure projects. The larger issue is whether the transaction has been structured in a manner that allows lenders and institutional investors to identify, quantify and allocate the principal risks.

Projects reaching financial close generally have several pieces aligned: site control, permits, EPC strategy, credible construction costs, reliable revenue arrangements, acceptable counterparties, adequate sponsor equity, appropriate security and a financing structure compatible with the jurisdiction and operating cash flows.

The latest deals also show that problems do not always need to be solved with more sponsor equity. Payment risk may require a guarantee. Development capital may require holdco financing. Timing mismatches may require an equity bridge. Currency risk may be better addressed through local institutional debt.

That distinction is central to sophisticated project finance structuring.

Financing an Energy or Infrastructure Project?

Financely works with project sponsors and operating companies on project finance structuring, lender placement, credit enhancement and structured debt transactions across energy, infrastructure and other capital-intensive sectors.

Request a Free Estimate

Reporting reflects publicly available information reviewed on October 5, 2026. Financely is an advisory firm and not a bank or lender. Financing structures, lender participation and transaction terms remain subject to due diligence, credit approval, definitive documentation and closing conditions.

Read more