How to Choose Among the Top 10 NAV Lenders in 2026
Compare 10 leading NAV lenders in 2026 and see which lenders fit private equity funds, family offices, portfolio finance and structured liquidity needs.
NAV lenders have become an increasingly important source of liquidity for private equity funds, family offices, holding companies and other investors with substantial private-market portfolios.
Instead of selling private investments to raise cash, a borrower may be able to obtain financing supported by the net asset value of those investments.
The market now includes dedicated NAV finance specialists, large private credit managers and global investment banks.
Choosing among them requires more than comparing brand names.
A $30 million NAV facility for a family office is a completely different credit proposition from a $500 million fund-level financing for a global private equity manager.
Here are 10 NAV lenders worth knowing in 2026 and where each may fit.
17Capital is one of the most established dedicated NAV finance specialists in the private equity market.
The firm provides NAV loans to private equity buyout funds through its Credit platform and financing to private equity management companies through its Strategic Lending business.
17Capital reports more than $18 billion deployed across more than 130 transactions.
Its NAV loans are typically designed around diversified portfolios managed by established private equity sponsors.
Common uses include increasing investment capacity, financing additional acquisitions, refinancing debt and generating liquidity.
17Capital generally emphasizes conservative loan-to-value ratios, diversified collateral and portfolio distributions as a source of repayment.
That makes it particularly relevant to institutional private equity sponsors with mature portfolios.
Hark Capital is another dedicated NAV finance specialist.
The firm has focused on fund financing since 2013 and provides NAV-based loans, GP and management company financing and customized private-market financing structures.
Hark reports more than $2.1 billion of deployed capital across more than 70 sponsors.
Its NAV loans can support follow-on investments, portfolio liquidity, capital structure optimization and other fund-level objectives.
Hark is particularly interesting because its business has historically focused on middle-market private equity sponsors rather than exclusively competing for the largest institutional transactions.
Its customized financing activity can also include concentrated portfolios and portfolios of LP interests.
Pemberton has built a dedicated NAV Financing strategy within its broader private credit platform.
Its NAV strategy provides financing against the underlying value of performing private equity portfolios, primarily through senior secured loans.
The strategy focuses on European and U.S. private equity buyout funds, GPs and LPs.
Typical uses include additional platform investments, bolt-on acquisitions, further investment into existing portfolio companies and capital structure optimization.
Pemberton closed its first NAV Financing Core Fund at approximately $1.7 billion in 2025.
Its positioning is particularly institutional, emphasizing diversified portfolios and relatively conservative senior lending.
Carlyle AlpInvest operates a substantial Portfolio Finance business alongside its private equity secondaries, primary investment and co-investment activities.
Its portfolio finance strategy provides financing to private equity funds, LP portfolios and general partners.
That breadth is important.
A borrower may have a liquidity requirement that can be addressed through senior NAV financing, structured portfolio financing, a secondary transaction or another capital solution.
AlpInvest has been active in portfolio finance since 2018 and has deployed billions of dollars through the strategy.
For sophisticated institutional sponsors, the combination of portfolio financing and secondaries expertise can be particularly useful.
Apollo's Sponsor and Secondary Solutions business, known as S3, provides financing and liquidity solutions to private-market asset managers and limited partners.
Its financing capabilities specifically include NAV-based fund finance, fund-secured lending and secured management-company financing.
The platform can also provide preferred equity, mezzanine capital and other structured liquidity solutions.
That means Apollo can potentially address transactions that do not fit neatly into a conventional senior NAV loan.
The platform operates across private equity, private credit, infrastructure and real estate.
For large sponsors, the ability to evaluate several forms of private-market liquidity from one platform can be valuable.
Arcmont operates a dedicated NAV Financing strategy focused on the private equity ecosystem.
Its strategy covers three broad forms of portfolio financing.
At the fund level, financing may provide additional capital for acquisitions, reduce asset-level debt or bridge financing requirements.
At the GP level, capital can support GP commitments, ownership transactions and strategic growth.
At the LP level, NAV financing can provide liquidity against a portfolio of fund interests and finance capital calls.
Arcmont emphasizes diversified asset-backed lending, conservative LTVs and senior structures.
Large investment banks are also important NAV lenders.
Goldman Sachs explicitly includes private equity and credit-backed NAV loans within its Fund Financing capabilities.
Bank NAV financing can be particularly attractive when the borrower has a highly diversified portfolio, substantial scale and an established institutional relationship.
Banks can often provide competitively priced senior capital where the transaction meets their underwriting requirements.
The trade-off can be flexibility.
Bank facilities may involve conservative advance rates, detailed eligibility requirements, substantial documentation and tight covenant packages.
For the right portfolio, that may still produce the most efficient financing.
J.P. Morgan is another major participant in fund finance and has publicly discussed the growing use of NAV lending.
NAV lending typically becomes more relevant later in the life of a private equity fund.
Early in a fund's life, borrowing capacity may be supported primarily by investor commitments through a subscription facility.
As those commitments are deployed, the fund's economic value increasingly sits in its underlying portfolio companies.
NAV financing allows lenders to underwrite that portfolio value instead.
For established private equity managers with diversified portfolios and significant banking relationships, a global bank such as J.P. Morgan can represent an important source of fund-level financing.
Ares operates one of the world's largest alternative investment platforms across credit, private equity, infrastructure and secondaries.
Its private-market activities include structured liquidity solutions, and Ares has discussed NAV loans as a mechanism that allows sponsors to generate liquidity without selling underlying assets.
The size and breadth of the Ares platform make it relevant to large and complicated private-market transactions.
A borrower may require something more flexible than a conventional bank NAV facility.
The transaction may involve structured credit, secondary liquidity, preferred capital or another portfolio solution.
Large alternative managers can be particularly useful when the financing requires substantial capital and bespoke underwriting.
Nodem
Many of the largest NAV lenders primarily compete for institutional private equity funds.
Family offices often occupy a different segment of the market.
Nodem focuses specifically on NAV facilities for family offices, GPs, LPs, investment holding companies and other private-asset holders.
The firm states that it typically considers NAV financing transactions from approximately $15 million to more than $100 million.
Its family-office strategy can include private equity fund interests, venture capital portfolios, operating businesses and other alternative investments.
Nodem also offers structures using payment-in-kind interest, which can be useful where the underlying private assets generate irregular cash distributions.
That makes it particularly relevant to family offices whose portfolios may not resemble traditional institutional private equity funds.
There Is No Single Best NAV Lender
A list of the top NAV lenders becomes misleading if borrower fit is ignored.
The strongest lender for a $500 million private equity facility may have no interest in a $20 million family office financing.
A lender prepared to finance a diversified portfolio of 20 mature buyout investments may refuse a portfolio concentrated in three venture capital companies.
Likewise, the lender offering the highest leverage does not automatically offer the best transaction.
Several factors should determine which NAV lenders are approached.
Facility Size
NAV lenders have minimum and maximum transaction sizes.
Large institutional lenders may prefer facilities above $100 million.
Specialist lenders can operate considerably below that level.
A lender search should therefore begin by identifying institutions that actually operate within the requested financing range.
Portfolio Composition
Collateral quality is central to NAV lending.
A diversified portfolio of mature private equity investments presents a very different credit profile from a concentrated venture portfolio.
Lenders will examine:
- Number of investments
- Sector diversification
- Geographic diversification
- Investment maturity
- Portfolio company performance
- Existing leverage
- Expected realizations
- Fund manager quality
- Valuation methodology
Two portfolios reporting the same NAV can therefore support very different amounts of debt.
Loan-to-Value
NAV lenders frequently use relatively conservative leverage.
The important figure is usually not the sponsor's reported NAV.
The lender may determine its own eligible NAV after valuation haircuts, concentration limits and asset exclusions.
Suppose a family office reports $500 million of investments.
After underwriting, a lender recognizes only $300 million as eligible NAV.
If the facility permits a 15% LTV, borrowing capacity would be approximately $45 million.
The headline portfolio value is therefore not the facility amount.
Collateral
Private investments cannot always be pledged as easily as publicly traded securities.
Partnership agreements, shareholder agreements and existing financing documents may contain transfer restrictions or consent requirements.
A NAV financing structure may therefore include a combination of:
- Equity pledges
- Pledges over holding companies
- Distribution rights
- Secured bank accounts
- Cash sweeps
- Negative pledges
- Mandatory prepayment provisions
Legal structure matters almost as much as portfolio value.
Use of Proceeds
NAV facilities can serve many purposes.
Common examples include:
- Follow-on acquisitions
- Portfolio company investment
- Capital calls
- Refinancing
- GP commitments
- Fund extensions
- New acquisitions
- Investor liquidity
- Working capital
- Portfolio optimization
Different NAV lenders have different appetites for these uses.
A lender comfortable financing accretive portfolio company acquisitions may take a different view of a facility whose primary purpose is distributions.
Sponsor Quality
NAV lenders also underwrite the people managing the portfolio.
A strong institutional sponsor typically provides regular reporting, credible valuations, audited financial information and a clear investment track record.
Governance matters.
The lender wants confidence that portfolio value is being measured accurately and that the borrower can manage the facility over its life.
Banks Versus Private Credit NAV Lenders
One of the most important decisions is whether to approach banks or private credit providers.
Banks
Banks can be highly competitive for senior institutional NAV facilities.
They tend to favor:
- Established managers
- Large portfolios
- Strong diversification
- Lower leverage
- Clear collateral
- Institutional reporting
Private Credit
Private credit NAV lenders can often provide greater flexibility.
They may consider:
- Higher leverage
- Smaller facilities
- Concentrated portfolios
- Non-standard collateral
- PIK interest
- Customized amortization
- More complex holding structures
That additional flexibility usually carries additional cost.
The cheapest NAV facility and the most flexible NAV facility are rarely the same loan.
NAV Lenders for Family Offices
Family office portfolios can be more complicated than conventional private equity funds.
A family office might own:
- Private companies directly
- Private equity LP interests
- Private credit investments
- Venture capital positions
- Co-investments
- Holding companies
- Real estate
- Other alternative assets
The family may have enormous net worth while having relatively limited immediate liquidity.
NAV financing can convert part of that private-market value into borrowing capacity without forcing an immediate asset sale.
The lender still needs to determine which investments qualify and where the debt should sit within the family office structure.
Financely has a dedicated overview of NAV loans for family offices and funds covering these transactions in greater detail.
NAV Lenders for Private Equity Funds
NAV financing is already well established among private equity funds.
A typical transaction occurs after much of the fund's committed capital has been deployed.
The fund owns a portfolio of valuable companies but has limited remaining uncalled capital.
A NAV lender provides financing against the value of that portfolio.
The proceeds may then finance:
- Bolt-on acquisitions
- Additional investment into portfolio companies
- Refinancing
- Liquidity requirements
- Fund expenses
- Other strategic initiatives
Debt can ultimately be repaid from portfolio company distributions and realizations.
Private equity managers can read more about NAV financing for private equity funds.
How to Approach NAV Lenders
Sending the same pitch deck to every lender on this list is not a financing strategy.
The transaction should first be prepared for underwriting.
A credible NAV financing package should normally identify:
- The proposed borrower
- Ownership structure
- Total portfolio NAV
- Individual portfolio investments
- Portfolio concentration
- Valuation methodology
- Existing asset-level leverage
- Expected distributions
- Expected exits
- Existing liens
- Requested facility amount
- Use of proceeds
- Desired maturity
- Proposed repayment sources
From there, lenders can be selected according to their actual strategy.
A specialist family-office NAV lender should not necessarily receive the same transaction as an institutional bank targeting large buyout funds.
Distribution should be selective.
Compare the Entire NAV Facility
Borrowers should also resist selecting a lender based entirely on the interest margin.
Important terms include:
| Facility Economics | Collateral and Structure | Ongoing Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Facility size | Eligible NAV definition | Reporting requirements |
| Advance rate | Concentration limits | Financial covenants |
| Interest rate | Valuation methodology | Cash sweeps |
| Cash-pay versus PIK interest | Collateral | Mandatory prepayments |
| Upfront fees | Maturity | Extension options |
| Undrawn fees | ||
A lender offering a slightly lower interest rate may provide substantially less usable liquidity.
Another lender may charge more but permit higher borrowing capacity and greater flexibility.
The economics should be evaluated across the entire transaction.
How to Choose the Right NAV Lender
There is no universal number-one NAV lender.
17Capital is one of the most established dedicated institutional NAV finance specialists.
Hark Capital has built a strong position in middle-market NAV financing.
Pemberton and Arcmont operate dedicated institutional NAV strategies.
Carlyle AlpInvest and Apollo S3 combine portfolio lending with broader private-market liquidity capabilities.
Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan bring substantial bank balance sheets and institutional fund-finance capabilities.
Ares can participate in large and sophisticated private-market liquidity transactions.
Nodem addresses an important part of the market involving family offices and portfolios that may not fit traditional institutional fund finance.
The right question is not:
Who is the biggest NAV lender?
The useful question is:
Which NAV lender is most likely to underwrite this portfolio, at this facility size, for this use of proceeds, with terms the borrower can actually live with?
That is how NAV lenders should be compared.
Seeking NAV Financing?
Financely works with family offices, funds, sponsors and private-asset holders seeking structured debt against eligible investment portfolios.
Request a Quote